Hangzhou assembled computers xiaocai reviews are reactionary Internet giant

Hangzhou Chua digital Since established in 2002 has been committed to creating first-class computer digital products, mainly engaged in professional DIY computer assembly, notebook wholesale, control engineering, installation, and some computer peripheral accessories wholesale. So far, digital computer technology entity Hangzhou Chua headquarters was formally established in Hangzhou, Wen San Road, Hangzhou Cai Digital has been holding the principles of integrity integrity of faith to offer you our best services. We do not flatter the customer is God's principles, our aim is to "allow customers to become our closest friends." Cai Xiao Cai 13175104159 Digital sincerely for your service, to provide a platform. Official website http://www.cscspc.com Chua Chua Chua Park Mall http://ccssm.taobao.com http://www.caiqinghua.cn industry upheaval caused confirm the status of the incumbent difficulties caused by the traditional business slowdown short-term earnings pressure in the capital markets, technology, users and ecosystems formed the incumbent oligopoly situation, will open a new page in the Internet field - those ambitious entrepreneurs, there is no doubt dark page. From Netscape and Yahoo started the trend has dominated the open development of the global Internet, but the next few years, the strategy has become more powerful through an open Internet giant, may reactionary. Needless to say, I am talking about here giant, referring to Google, Facebook advertised by the open Internet, or open promoters like Apple controlled. Specifically, they are more clearly and firmly than in the past the use of resources in the hands of accumulation, open and past collaborators to compete for those open strategy of potential beneficiaries preparedness stocks were even banned from pursuing favorable to its own commercialization strategy becomes more aggressive. In Facebook, for example, and its success with the "infrastructure of the Internet," the opening-up strategy has a direct relationship, the strategy implies, Facebook simply attract more users to come and stay, the more third-party application development who wanted to come, so that more real or virtual acts happen here, Facebook will be able to benefit from it, including advertising, application sharing, intermediary fees, or virtual currency. However, the evaluation of this strategy requires a phased see: the early stages, it is a pure challenger strategy, the purpose is to resolve the powerful Google search incumbent fortress built up; but Facebook has become a company with nearly 10 million active users The incumbent, it will need to reconsider the necessity, unless it helps defend the vested position Facebook. Well, now open strategy whether Facebook is the most effective strategy? It depends on two premises: first, those third-party application developers are very willing to accept this position, the center position will not harm even challenge Facebook, the second is Facebook and he believes it as the location of Internet traffic centers have not challenge. For example, when it felt short photo-sharing website Snapchat may pose a threat, but refused when trying to buy, Zuckerberg will personally use 12 days time to completely copy it, and proud. Another example is the same before between Twitter Instagram launched on mutual ban, and in recent days blocked access to Russian Internet giant Yandex mobile social assistant Wonder thereof. Then talk about Google. It was originally to play a neutral data mining and matching role (essentially an open strategy), while the old generation of Yahoo content portal subversion off Internet Network Information Center where it was laid by search engines so through the use of technology firm, that it has enough self-confidence, continue to "Do not be evil" as a core concept, as long as the free and open flow of information, it will be able to maximize the benefits. When Facebook appeared, although Google via Google+ fought back, but more like a defense of the incumbent, and therefore did not get much success. But Apple's iOS mobile end ripped through a huge gap, could threaten its central position, it reinforces the strategy of opening up, tried to break through Android to Apple's fortress, and this one worked. But who can guarantee that the next Google will not become preoccupied with and even closed? Yes, it is so far on Android have shown generous enough, but who can say that this is not because it needs it - it get dominance of urgency in moving end, this urgency has been Facebook social networking the network strengthened its damage. According to the most recent quarterly financial report, its traditional business has matured, while mobile Internet is becoming a new growth engine. I think, at least the following three cases in one occurrence, Google is likely the strategy of opening contrary: If Google can not be sure of its dominant position in the mobile Internet (such as Samsung and other manufacturers start the main push their own system), or a further decline in traditional business, and natural growth of the business from the mobile Internet can not keep up with the rhythm, or the value of the field of advertising came to a standstill. Apple represents another open mode - though many people prefer it as a representative of a closed business systems. Apple launched more third-party application developers, but in the past these people as members of a company's internal exists. Because Apple from the outset to ensure that its own system platform and user control, so that it can open for third parties who maintain adequate open. But the future may become generous history, because as the decline in the value of the hardware side, the growth slowing down and increasing competition, the value of Apple's focus will shift to the mobile Internet, then it is likely to doubt its dominant position, which will enable it to Possible damage remain vigilant. For example, although Google Maps is good, but it still eager own instead, because it fears the flow of Google users. Another example in social networks, and even the value of e-commerce powerhouse, it may intervene personally, as a market value of nearly $ 400 billion company, it must obtain sufficient sources of value. For the new third-party applications, it will remain more vigilant, because it feared churn, decrease in the value of the hardware, the user will be the last bastion of its value. Obviously, these two do not have now. It has trouble breaking up and Zynga, Zynga unwilling to just one screw and profit contributors Facebook platform, Zynga and Facebook are afraid it will be for the position, and a large number of users to elope. At the same time, progress in commercialization strategy flow, and pressure in the pressure of the capital market, dominance Zynga lessons, as well as mobile terminals, have it begin to doubt their own status at any time in danger of being subversive. Thus, Facebook again when third-party developers and cooperation, will be more care in the future can be controlled, more mercenary, and for any new Internet innovation, it will be more vigilance, and it was all around a center: to defend their strong The incumbent status, and to maximize commercialization, in order to meet the requirements of the capital market earnings. That is, before the completion of the field in the global Internet to re-shuffle, the new incumbent to establish its strong position, would expand the fight between all the incumbents and their new challenger as instinct, existing The giant will take advantage of what they think their own resources to carry out more stringent protection as a win new location of the capital. Yes, according to KK's statement, under the impetus of the user and technology, the future of the Internet is open, but specific to commercial micro level, I believe that only when the few leading oligarchs are confirmed, they will be dedicated to promoting open because then open is controllable, it is for them the most favorable strategy. In the individual stage, anti-open briefly occupy the leading position, because: Today's Internet has formed a number of dominant position in the capital markets, technology, users and ecosystems oligarchs, in front of them (especially As they became more reactionary), the user and the power of technology will become very small.